General Information | |
---|---|
Name | Paul’s intensely personal letter is named for its recipients, the church in Philippi. |
Author And Date | Paul identifies himself and Timothy as the senders of Philippians. Paul’s authorship of the letter was universally accepted in the early church, and there has been no serious scholarly challenge to his authorship. A few have argued that Philippians is composed of two or even three letters, but these arguments have are not convincing. The letter’s date is somewhat less certain. Paul does give clues as to when it was written, such as that he wrote it from prison, and guarded by Praetorian (palace) guards (1:13), and how far from Philippi he was, since Paul speaks of several trips between where he was and Philippi. This has led to four places of writing (and four corresponding dates): Corinth, Ephesus, Caesarea and Rome. Corinth (in A.D. 50) is the least popular option, and is based on Acts 18:10, where the Lord tells Paul that “no one will attack you to hurt you.” However, there is no evidence Paul was imprisoned in Corinth. Slightly more popular is Ephesus and a date of 53-55. Ephesus was fairly close to Philippi, and may have had a Praetorian Guard contingent stationed there. Again though, there is no evidence Paul was ever imprisoned in Ephesus. A slightly stronger argument may be made for Caesarea, cira 58-59. There were at times Praetorian Guard there, and Paul was imprisoned in the city. However, Caesarea was far away from Philippi, and there is no evidence Paul was ever released from prison while there. Moreover, Paul’s expectation of imminent release from prison in Philippians (1:19, 16; 2:24) doesn’t match his situation in Caesarea, where he languished while awaiting transport to Rome to appear before Caesar. The earliest theory and best fit for the place of writing is Rome, sometime between 60 and 62. Paul was under house arrest there, and although Rome is a considerable distance from Philippi, Paul was in Rome long enough to allow trips to Philippi. |
Audience | The recipients of the letter were the believers in Philippi, a church Paul founded during his second missionary journey, in A.D. 51. |
Message and Occasion | Philippians is Paul’s most personal letter. The language reveals a deep love and appreciation for the Philippians. Despite his imprisonment and concerns about infighting in the church at Rome, Philippians is also a letter of joy. Paul used the word rejoice eight times, joy four times and glad three times in this short letter. He also speaks of unity. He implores the Philippians to be “like-minded, having the same love, being of one accord, of one mind” (2:2). There was apparently some kind of disagreement between two leading women in Philippi, whom Paul urged to “be of the same mind in the Lord.” Paul also spoke of humility. Although often studied for its Christological implications, in Phil 2:1-11, Paul urges believers to have the same attitude of humility and servanthood as Jesus. Other themes include avoiding legalism, appreciation for and the source of salvation, and stewardship. |
Key Information | |
---|---|
Key Verses | 1:19-21 “For I know that this will turn out for my deliverance through your prayer and the supply of the Spirit of Jesus Christ, according to my earnest expectation and hope that in nothing I shall be ashamed, but with all boldness, as always, so now also Christ will be magnified in my body, whether by life or by death. For to me, to live is Christ, and to die is gain.” 2:1-11 “Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men. And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross. Therefore God also has highly exalted Him and given Him the name which is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth, and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” 3:1 “Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. For me to write the same things to you is not tedious, but for you it is safe.” 4:8-9 “Finally, brethren, whatever things are true, whatever things are noble, whatever things are just, whatever things are pure, whatever things are lovely, whatever things are of good report, if there is any virtue and if there is anything praiseworthy—meditate on these things. The things which you learned and received and heard and saw in me, these do, and the God of peace will be with you.” |
Key People | Church in Philippi Paul says the believers in Philippi had shown great care and generosity toward him, and calls them “beloved and longed-for brethren, my joy and crown” (4:1) Euodia and Sytyche and the unnamed “true companion” Theses were apparently two important women in the Philippian church who were having a disagreement. Paul calls on them to put aside their differences and “be of the same mind” (4:1). It was probably not a moral or theological dispute, since Paul doesn’t include any answer or call to submit to Christ or the church. He also urges an unnamed “true companion” to “help these women.” It has been speculated this was Timothy, Silas, Epaphroditus, or some friend of Paul’s in the Philippian church. Some have even postulated that the Greek word for “true companion,” suzuge, was actually a proper name, Suzuge, but this word has never been found as a person’s name, in the Bible or any other ancient writing. Epaphroditus Paul calls the person tasked with delivering the Epistle “my brother, fellow worker, and fellow soldier.” He had also delivered the Philippian’s gift to Paul. Paul says Epaphroditus was distressed when he was sick “almost unto death,” not because of his sickness, but because he heard that the Philippians were worried about him. He tells the Philippians to “receive him..in the Lord with gladness.” Epaphroditus stands as an example of the kind of humility and servanthood Paul urges in Philippians. |
Key Events | The Philippian church sending Paul a gift of support Paul called the Philippian church’s gift a “sweet-smelling aroma, an acceptable sacrifice, well pleasing to God.” This was not the first time the Philippians had helped Paul, but the latest in a long line of support for the Apostle. |
Important theology in Philippians | |
---|---|
The Kenosis | Much theological ink has been spilled attempting to understand what Paul’s words in Philippians 2:7. The Greek word “kenóō” literally means to remove the content of something. However, nuanced meanings of the word include the idea of taking away something’s effectiveness by depriving it of its power (c.f. 1 Cor 1:17), taking away something’s significance by destroying it, making it invalid or empty (1 Cor 9:15), or taking away the privilege of something’s status. There is no room for an in depth discussion of all the possible meanings here, but the leading (orthodox) theories will be mentioned. Some have argued Christ “gave up” some of His divine attributes in the incarnation. However, this view suffers from the fact that for God the Son to loose even one of His attributes is to loose His deity entirely. Others have argued that Christ “gave up” the use of His divine attributes. This view also suffers from the theological problem that not being able to use an attribute is akin to loosing the attribute itself. A third argument says that Christ “gave up” only the “free and independent use of His divine attributes in the incarnation. This view argues that Christ only made use of things like omniscience and omnipotence when it was the Father’s will to do so. Again though, lack of use is the same of not having the attribute. All of the above views also suffer from tending to forget the two natures (divine and human) existing in the Person of Christ, as well as attempting to use Phil 2:7 to explain how Jesus at times A fourth view is that Christ taking on human nature and becoming a servant involved leaving His privilege, rank and position. This is the “emptying” and Paul doesn’t speak of Christ’s attributes at all. Moreover, unlike the other views, it doesn’t ignore or downplay the hypostatic union – that the divine Son’s nature and the human nature were joined into one Person in Christ, but without “mixture or confusion.” |
General Outline |
---|
Salutation (1:1-2) |
Used by permission. ©2017 H. Wayne House, Charting the New Testament. All Rights Reserved.