1Be imitators of me, even as I also am of Christ.
2Now I praise you, brothers, that you remember me in all things, and hold firm the traditions, even as I delivered them to you. 3But I would have you know that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God. 4Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonors his head. 5But every woman praying or prophesying with her head uncovered dishonors her head. For it is one and the same thing as if she were shaved. 6For if a woman is not covered, let her hair also be cut off. But if it is shameful for a woman to have her hair cut off or be shaved, let her be covered. 7For a man indeed ought not to have his head covered, because he is the image and glory of God, but the woman is the glory of the man. 8For man is not from woman, but woman from man; 9for man wasn’t created for the woman, but woman for the man. 10For this cause the woman ought to have authority over her own head, because of the angels.
11Nevertheless, neither is the woman independent of the man, nor the man independent of the woman, in the Lord. 12For as woman came from man, so a man also comes through a woman; but all things are from God. 13Judge for yourselves. Is it appropriate that a woman pray to God unveiled? 14Doesn’t even nature itself teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him? 15But if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her, for her hair is given to her for a covering. 16But if any man seems to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither do God’s assemblies.
17But in giving you this command I don’t praise you, because you come together not for the better but for the worse. 18For first of all, when you come together in the assembly, I hear that divisions exist among you, and I partly believe it. 19For there also must be factions among you, that those who are approved may be revealed among you. 20When therefore you assemble yourselves together, it is not the Lord’s supper that you eat. 21For in your eating each one takes his own supper first. One is hungry, and another is drunken. 22What, don’t you have houses to eat and to drink in? Or do you despise God’s assembly and put them to shame who don’t have enough? What shall I tell you? Shall I praise you? In this I don’t praise you.
23For I received from the Lord that which also I delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night in which he was betrayed took bread. 24When he had given thanks, he broke it and said, “Take, eat. This is my body, which is broken for you. Do this in memory of me.” 25In the same way he also took the cup after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink, in memory of me.” 26For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes.
27Therefore whoever eats this bread or drinks the Lord’s cup in a way unworthy of the Lord will be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord. 28But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the bread and drink of the cup. 29For he who eats and drinks in an unworthy way eats and drinks judgment to himself if he doesn’t discern the Lord’s body. 30For this cause many among you are weak and sickly, and not a few sleep. 31For if we discerned ourselves, we wouldn’t be judged. 32But when we are judged, we are disciplined by the Lord, that we may not be condemned with the world. 33Therefore, my brothers, when you come together to eat, wait for one another. 34But if anyone is hungry, let him eat at home, lest your coming together be for judgment. The rest I will set in order whenever I come.
Hebrews is one of the most theologically profound books of the New Testament, masterfully bridging the Old and New Covenants. It presents Christ as both High Priest and God, fulfilling and surpassing the Levitical system. Its literary sophistication and doctrinal depth make it a cornerstone of Christian theology.
Though it proclaims the superiority of the New Covenant in Christ, Hebrews contains more Old Testament quotations, allusions, and references—proportionally—than any other New Testament book, even surpassing Romans and Matthew in intertextual depth. This remarkable density reflects the author’s profound grasp of God’s covenants with Abraham, Moses, and David, and reinforces his authority to declare how the New Covenant fulfills and surpasses the Old.
The authorship of the Book of Hebrews has been a subject of debate for centuries. The author does not explicitly identify himself in the text, which has led to various theories. Some of the most prominent suggestions are:
Paul: Many in the early church traditionally attributed Hebrews to the Apostle Paul due to the letter’s theological depth and focus on Christ as the High Priest. However, many modern scholars doubt Paul’s authorship for several reasons, including the style of his Greek, the lack of a typical Pauline greeting, and the absence of his usual references to his apostleship.
Barnabas: Some early church fathers, including Tertullian, proposed that Barnabas, a companion, might have written Hebrews. Barnabas was a Levite, which could account for the author’s deep appreciation of Jewish customs and priesthood.
Apollos: Martin Luther suggested Apollos, a learned man from Alexandria who was known for his eloquence and knowledge of the Scriptures, and as a potential author. The argument is based on the fact that the author of Hebrews demonstrates a profound understanding of Jewish Law, which fits with Apollos’ reputation as a learned, eloquent missionary (Acts 18:24-28; 1 Cor 3:5-6; Titus 3:13), as well as a profound knowledge of classical Greek.
Priscilla: Some scholars, including the early church theologian Origen, suggested that Priscilla, a prominent early Christian figure, could have written the book. This theory is less common but is considered due to the text’s lack of gender-specific references and the intellectual skill in explaining complex theology.
Unknown Author: There is no direct evidence to support authorship by any of these candidates. The most widely accepted view among modern scholars is that the author of Hebrews remains unknown. Despite Origen’s speculation about Priscilla as the author, he also wrote that “only God knows” who wrote the epistle. He acknowledged its canonicity, however, writing, “The church has received the book, and it is read in the churches.”
There are compelling reasons to believe that Paul composed the letter, with Luke serving as his scribe during Paul’s first imprisonment in Rome.
One key objection to Pauline authorship is Hebrews 2:3: “How shall we escape if we neglect such a great salvation? It was declared at first by the Lord, and it was attested to us by those who heard.” Critics argue that this verse implies the author was not an eyewitness of Christ’s ministry, whereas Paul received direct revelation from the risen Jesus, who spoke with Paul seven times (Acts 9:4-6; 18:9-10; 22:7-8, 17-21; 18:9-10; 20:35; 23:11; 26:14-15; Galatians 1:11-12; 1 Cor 11:23; 2 Cor 12:9). However, Paul did interact with Jesus post-resurrection. This verse can, therefore, be interpreted as simply acknowledging Paul’s lack of firsthand experience with Christ before the resurrection, rather than excluding him as the author.
Paul’s letters consistently open with his name—yet Hebrews is anonymous. Why? One possible reason is Paul’s strained relationship with many of the Jews. Throughout Acts, Paul’s teachings led to controversy, riots, and rejection among Jews (Acts 21:27-36). If he had placed his name at the start of the letter to the Hebrews, Jewish readers opposed to Paul might have dismissed it before reading it. By leaving it anonymous, he allowed the message to stand on its own merits.
While Hebrews differs stylistically from Paul’s, this could be explained if Luke served as Paul’s scribe or translator:
Paul’s, that is, was written to people in response to specific events or questions; Hebrews is pure theology, and thus, it is understandable that its author would adopt a more formal rhetoric. This theory would account for both the Pauline thought and the Lukan Greek style.
Hebrews 13:24 states, “Those from Italy send you greetings.” This strongly suggests that the author wrote the letter from Rome. There is no evidence from the apostolic age claiming that Barnabas or Apollos ever went to Italy. Certainly, Priscilla and Aquila did, for they were originally from Italy (Acts 18:2), and in AD 54, Paul addressed his book of Romans to the believers there, including them (Rom 16:3-5). The greetings from Italy fit neatly with Paul’s first or second imprisonment in Rome, where Luke was present.
Given its themes of endurance under persecution and the superiority of Christ over the Mosaic Law, Hebrews aligns well with Paul’s concerns. If he were the author, this would be his fourteenth New Testament letter. (Three of his epistles—his first and third letters to Corinth and one to Laodicea—are lost.)
While Hebrews does not bear Paul’s name, its theological depth, connection to Timothy (see below), and alignment with Paul’s circumstances make it plausible that he conceived the letter, with Luke refining and writing it down.
Another subtle clue points to Paul: his self-identification as “Hebrew of Hebrews”(Phil 3:5), together with the linguistic pattern of the New Testament, which overwhelmingly refers to the people of Judea as “Jews” (190 times) or “Israel” (68 times). The term “Hebrews” appears only three times (Acts 6:1;2 Cor 11:22; Phil 3:5)—two of which are in Paul’s writings. This suggests that if Paul wrote Hebrews, he may have intentionally chosen the rare term “Hebrews” to address his Jewish audience in a distinct way.
Hebrews provides a key historical reference, mentioning Timothy’s release (Heb 13:23), suggesting Timothy was either imprisoned and then freed or “released” on a specific mission, probably by Paul. Hebrews states in four places that the Levitical priesthood was still active at the time of writing (Heb 7:8; 8:3-5; 9:6-9; 10:1-3), affirming that the book was written before AD 70 when the Roman general Titus destroyed Jerusalem and the Temple.
If the Temple had already been destroyed, the author could have made a compelling argument against reverting to Judaism—namely, that the entire sacrificial system had ceased to exist. Instead, the warnings against returning to the Old Covenant system imply that it was still an active and available option. Hebrews was thus written before the fall of Jerusalem on 10 Av, August 3, AD 70 (Josephus, The War of the Jews, 6:4:5).